<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Is The Difference Between .htm And .html?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://businessonlinecoach.com/questions/what-is-the-difference-between-htm-and-html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://businessonlinecoach.com/questions/what-is-the-difference-between-htm-and-html/</link>
	<description>Helping Your Business Grow Successfully Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 14:25:54 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://businessonlinecoach.com/questions/what-is-the-difference-between-htm-and-html/comment-page-1/#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 03:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://businessonlinecoach.com/questions/what-is-the-difference-between-htm-and-html/#comment-554</guid>
		<description>Practically speaking, there is no difference between the two extensions. Both denote that the file contains HTML. This is really a matter of convention and is not an absolute, but most realize that a file whose extension is htm or  html contains HTML.
On most, if not all, servers either file will be sent with a MIME type of text/html by default. This can usually be changed by the server&#039;s administrator(s), but is, more often then not, left alone.
On most, if not all, browsers, either file will be displayed as intended (i.e. rendered according to the browser&#039;s default manner of displaying HTML documents). This last is due more to the MIME type sent by the server then by the file&#039;s extension, but that&#039;s a matter for another FAQ.
Generally, the use of htm over html, or vice versa, is left to the author&#039;s personal preferences. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Practically speaking, there is no difference between the two extensions. Both denote that the file contains HTML. This is really a matter of convention and is not an absolute, but most realize that a file whose extension is htm or  html contains HTML.<br />
On most, if not all, servers either file will be sent with a MIME type of text/html by default. This can usually be changed by the server&#8217;s administrator(s), but is, more often then not, left alone.<br />
On most, if not all, browsers, either file will be displayed as intended (i.e. rendered according to the browser&#8217;s default manner of displaying HTML documents). This last is due more to the MIME type sent by the server then by the file&#8217;s extension, but that&#8217;s a matter for another FAQ.<br />
Generally, the use of htm over html, or vice versa, is left to the author&#8217;s personal preferences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thornhar</title>
		<link>http://businessonlinecoach.com/questions/what-is-the-difference-between-htm-and-html/comment-page-1/#comment-553</link>
		<dc:creator>thornhar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://businessonlinecoach.com/questions/what-is-the-difference-between-htm-and-html/#comment-553</guid>
		<description>The reason for the htm extension is that Microsoft needed to make file names conform to the old 8.3 naming convention: eight characters for the name and three characters for the extension. This convention was carried over from early versions of MS-DOS, which copied it from a still earlier operating system called CP/M.
As far as picking which version to use, I&#039;d say go with html. Since Microsoft added long file name support (over ten years ago), I doubt there are any servers out there that require htm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason for the htm extension is that Microsoft needed to make file names conform to the old 8.3 naming convention: eight characters for the name and three characters for the extension. This convention was carried over from early versions of MS-DOS, which copied it from a still earlier operating system called CP/M.<br />
As far as picking which version to use, I&#8217;d say go with html. Since Microsoft added long file name support (over ten years ago), I doubt there are any servers out there that require htm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

